On Wed 07-11-12 14:53:40, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:46:40 +0100
> Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > > Realistically, is anyone likely to hurt from this?
> >
> > The primary motivation for the fix was a real report by a customer.
>
> Describe it please and I'll copy it to the
On Wed 07-11-12 14:53:40, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:46:40 +0100
Michal Hocko mho...@suse.cz wrote:
Realistically, is anyone likely to hurt from this?
The primary motivation for the fix was a real report by a customer.
Describe it please and I'll copy it to the
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:46:40 +0100
Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Realistically, is anyone likely to hurt from this?
>
> The primary motivation for the fix was a real report by a customer.
Describe it please and I'll copy it to the changelog.
So that Greg can understand why we sent this at him and so
On Wed 07-11-12 14:10:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:04:08 +0200
> Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > As Kosaki correctly pointed out, the glogal reclaim doesn't have this
> > issue because we _do_ swap on swappinnes==0 so the swap space has
> > to be considered. So the v2 is just acks
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:04:08 +0200
Michal Hocko wrote:
> As Kosaki correctly pointed out, the glogal reclaim doesn't have this
> issue because we _do_ swap on swappinnes==0 so the swap space has
> to be considered. So the v2 is just acks + changelog fix.
>
> Changes since v1
> - drop a note
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:04:08 +0200
Michal Hocko mho...@suse.cz wrote:
As Kosaki correctly pointed out, the glogal reclaim doesn't have this
issue because we _do_ swap on swappinnes==0 so the swap space has
to be considered. So the v2 is just acks + changelog fix.
Changes since v1
- drop a
On Wed 07-11-12 14:10:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:04:08 +0200
Michal Hocko mho...@suse.cz wrote:
As Kosaki correctly pointed out, the glogal reclaim doesn't have this
issue because we _do_ swap on swappinnes==0 so the swap space has
to be considered. So the v2 is just
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:46:40 +0100
Michal Hocko mho...@suse.cz wrote:
Realistically, is anyone likely to hurt from this?
The primary motivation for the fix was a real report by a customer.
Describe it please and I'll copy it to the changelog.
So that Greg can understand why we sent this at
As Kosaki correctly pointed out, the glogal reclaim doesn't have this
issue because we _do_ swap on swappinnes==0 so the swap space has
to be considered. So the v2 is just acks + changelog fix.
Changes since v1
- drop a note about global swappiness affected as well from the
changelog
- stable
As Kosaki correctly pointed out, the glogal reclaim doesn't have this
issue because we _do_ swap on swappinnes==0 so the swap space has
to be considered. So the v2 is just acks + changelog fix.
Changes since v1
- drop a note about global swappiness affected as well from the
changelog
- stable
10 matches
Mail list logo