Hi Yu,
[auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc3 next-20170602]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Yu-Zhao/memcg-refactor-mem_cgroup_resize_limit/20
Hi Yu,
[auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc3 next-20170602]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Yu-Zhao/memcg-refactor-mem_cgroup_resize_limit/20
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:09:42PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 01:04:37PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > @@ -2498,22 +2449,24 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct
> > mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > }
> >
> > mutex_lock(&memcg_limit_mutex);
>
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 01:04:37PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> @@ -2498,22 +2449,24 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct
> mem_cgroup *memcg,
> }
>
> mutex_lock(&memcg_limit_mutex);
> - if (limit < memcg->memory.limit) {
> + inverted
mem_cgroup_resize_limit() and mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit() have
identical logics. Refactor code so we don't need to keep two pieces
of code that does same thing.
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov
---
Changelog since v1:
* minor style change
mm/memcontrol.c | 73 ++---
5 matches
Mail list logo
