Em Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:22:15PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Could this patch be accepted?
> I'm working on the supporting for stdio mode. I just wish to post the patch
> series after this patch being merged.
merged, please proceed.
- Arnaldo
> Thanks
> Jin Yao
>
> On 2/27/2018
Em Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:22:15PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Could this patch be accepted?
> I'm working on the supporting for stdio mode. I just wish to post the patch
> series after this patch being merged.
merged, please proceed.
- Arnaldo
> Thanks
> Jin Yao
>
> On 2/27/2018
Hi,
Could this patch be accepted?
I'm working on the supporting for stdio mode. I just wish to post the
patch series after this patch being merged.
Thanks
Jin Yao
On 2/27/2018 5:38 PM, Jin Yao wrote:
Unlike the perf report interactive annotate mode, the perf annotate
doesn't display the
Hi,
Could this patch be accepted?
I'm working on the supporting for stdio mode. I just wish to post the
patch series after this patch being merged.
Thanks
Jin Yao
On 2/27/2018 5:38 PM, Jin Yao wrote:
Unlike the perf report interactive annotate mode, the perf annotate
doesn't display the
Unlike the perf report interactive annotate mode, the perf annotate
doesn't display the IPC/Cycle even if branch info is recorded in perf
data file.
perf record -b ...
perf annotate function
It should show IPC/cycle, but it doesn't.
This patch lets perf annotate support the displaying of
Unlike the perf report interactive annotate mode, the perf annotate
doesn't display the IPC/Cycle even if branch info is recorded in perf
data file.
perf record -b ...
perf annotate function
It should show IPC/cycle, but it doesn't.
This patch lets perf annotate support the displaying of
6 matches
Mail list logo
