Re: [PATCH v2] perf report: Make --branch-history work without callgraphs(-g) option in perf record

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:41:07PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:49:30AM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: > > Hi Arnaldo, > > > > Is this patch OK for merging? It's more than 2 months no more comments. > > This is not an area I'm completely familiar with, so having

Re: [PATCH v2] perf report: Make --branch-history work without callgraphs(-g) option in perf record

Em Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:49:30AM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: > Hi Arnaldo, > > Is this patch OK for merging? It's more than 2 months no more comments. This is not an area I'm completely familiar with, so having other people vouch for it, reviewing, acking it surely should speed merging, can you f

Re: [PATCH v2] perf report: Make --branch-history work without callgraphs(-g) option in perf record

Hi Arnaldo, Is this patch OK for merging? It's more than 2 months no more comments. Thanks Jin Yao On 5/8/2017 6:43 PM, Jin Yao wrote: perf record -b -g perf report --branch-history This merges the LBRs with the callgraphs. However it would be nice if it also works without callgraphs (-g)

[PATCH v2] perf report: Make --branch-history work without callgraphs(-g) option in perf record

perf record -b -g perf report --branch-history This merges the LBRs with the callgraphs. However it would be nice if it also works without callgraphs (-g) set in perf record, so that only the LBRs are displayed. But currently perf report errors in this case. For example, perf record -b perf re