Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-12-22 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 30 November 2015 09:47:03 Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, >> > so it cannot be printed using the

Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-12-22 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 30 November 2015 09:47:03 Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, >> > so it

Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-12-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 30 November 2015 09:47:03 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, > > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly > > warns: > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-12-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 30 November 2015 09:47:03 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, > > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly > >

Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly > warns: > > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe': >

Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly > warns: > > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe': >

Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-19 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:21:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly > warns: > > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe': >

Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-19 Thread Ludovic Desroches
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:21:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly > warns: > > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe': >

[PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly warns: pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe': pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned

[PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource

2015-11-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly warns: pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe': pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned