Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:46:42PM +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:45:33PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote: > > support pfuze200 chip which remove SW1C and SW4 based on pfuze100. > > Applied, thanks - however I just noticed that you forgot to add the > compatible string for the new

Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:46:42PM +0800, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:45:33PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote: support pfuze200 chip which remove SW1C and SW4 based on pfuze100. Applied, thanks - however I just noticed that you forgot to add the compatible string for the new part

RE: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-03 Thread Yibin Gong
Message- From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:47 PM To: Gong Yibin-B38343 Cc: lgirdw...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:45:33PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote

Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:26AM +, Yibin Gong wrote: > Thanks for your reminding, PFUZE200 is currently validated on > the same board(i.MX6Q Sabresd) which mounted with PFUZE100 > before. So the patch only adding driver level support to let > others can easily add

Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:45:33PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote: > support pfuze200 chip which remove SW1C and SW4 based on pfuze100. Applied, thanks - however I just noticed that you forgot to add the compatible string for the new part to the DT binding, please send a followup doing that.

[PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-03 Thread Robin Gong
support pfuze200 chip which remove SW1C and SW4 based on pfuze100. Signed-off-by: Robin Gong --- drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 196 +++- include/linux/regulator/pfuze100.h | 14 +++ 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-03 Thread Robin Gong
support pfuze200 chip which remove SW1C and SW4 based on pfuze100. Signed-off-by: Robin Gong b38...@freescale.com --- drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 196 +++- include/linux/regulator/pfuze100.h | 14 +++ 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 53

Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:45:33PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote: support pfuze200 chip which remove SW1C and SW4 based on pfuze100. Applied, thanks - however I just noticed that you forgot to add the compatible string for the new part to the DT binding, please send a followup doing that.

RE: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-03 Thread Yibin Gong
Message- From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:47 PM To: Gong Yibin-B38343 Cc: lgirdw...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:45:33PM +0800, Robin Gong wrote

Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: pfuze100: add pfuze200 support

2014-03-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:00:26AM +, Yibin Gong wrote: Thanks for your reminding, PFUZE200 is currently validated on the same board(i.MX6Q Sabresd) which mounted with PFUZE100 before. So the patch only adding driver level support to let others can easily add