Hi Ulf,
On 9/11/2018 5:00 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
+Viresh
On 4 September 2018 at 09:10, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
With rpmh ARC resources being modelled as power domains with performance
state,
we need to proxy vote on these for SDM845.
Add support to vote on multiple of them, now that genpd
Hi Ulf,
On 9/11/2018 5:00 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
+Viresh
On 4 September 2018 at 09:10, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
With rpmh ARC resources being modelled as power domains with performance
state,
we need to proxy vote on these for SDM845.
Add support to vote on multiple of them, now that genpd
+Viresh
On 4 September 2018 at 09:10, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> With rpmh ARC resources being modelled as power domains with performance
> state,
> we need to proxy vote on these for SDM845.
> Add support to vote on multiple of them, now that genpd supports
> associating
> mutliple power domains
+Viresh
On 4 September 2018 at 09:10, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> With rpmh ARC resources being modelled as power domains with performance
> state,
> we need to proxy vote on these for SDM845.
> Add support to vote on multiple of them, now that genpd supports
> associating
> mutliple power domains
With rpmh ARC resources being modelled as power domains with performance
state,
we need to proxy vote on these for SDM845.
Add support to vote on multiple of them, now that genpd supports
associating
mutliple power domains to a device.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
---
Changes in v2:
* Drop the
With rpmh ARC resources being modelled as power domains with performance
state,
we need to proxy vote on these for SDM845.
Add support to vote on multiple of them, now that genpd supports
associating
mutliple power domains to a device.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
---
Changes in v2:
* Drop the
6 matches
Mail list logo
