Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: fix update the nohz.next_balance even if we haven't done any load balance

* Wanpeng Li [2015-03-27 15:52:30]: > As Srikar pointed out (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/27/26): > > | With the current code when the ilb cpus are not free: > | - We would be updating the nohz.next_balance even through we havent done > | any load balance. > | - We might iterate thro the

[PATCH v2] sched/fair: fix update the nohz.next_balance even if we haven't done any load balance

As Srikar pointed out (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/27/26): | With the current code when the ilb cpus are not free: | - We would be updating the nohz.next_balance even through we havent done | any load balance. | - We might iterate thro the nohz.idle_cpus_mask()s to find balance_cpus. This

Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: fix update the nohz.next_balance even if we haven't done any load balance

* Wanpeng Li wanpeng...@linux.intel.com [2015-03-27 15:52:30]: As Srikar pointed out (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/27/26): | With the current code when the ilb cpus are not free: | - We would be updating the nohz.next_balance even through we havent done | any load balance. | - We might

[PATCH v2] sched/fair: fix update the nohz.next_balance even if we haven't done any load balance

As Srikar pointed out (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/27/26): | With the current code when the ilb cpus are not free: | - We would be updating the nohz.next_balance even through we havent done | any load balance. | - We might iterate thro the nohz.idle_cpus_mask()s to find balance_cpus. This