Hi Doug,
On 7/28/20 5:48 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 2:44 AM Stanimir Varbanov
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 7/25/20 12:17 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Boyd
>>>
>>> The busy loop in rpmh_rsc_send_data() is written with the assumption
>>> that
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 2:44 AM Stanimir Varbanov
wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 7/25/20 12:17 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > From: Stephen Boyd
> >
> > The busy loop in rpmh_rsc_send_data() is written with the assumption
> > that the udelay will be preempted by the tcs_tx_done() irq handler
Hi,
Change looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah
Thanks,
Maulik
On 7/25/2020 2:47 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
From: Stephen Boyd
The busy loop in rpmh_rsc_send_data() is written with the assumption
that the udelay will be preempted by the tcs_tx_done() irq handler when
the TCS slots are
Hi Stephen,
On 7/25/20 12:17 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> From: Stephen Boyd
>
> The busy loop in rpmh_rsc_send_data() is written with the assumption
> that the udelay will be preempted by the tcs_tx_done() irq handler when
> the TCS slots are all full. This doesn't hold true when the calling
>
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:17 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Boyd
>
> The busy loop in rpmh_rsc_send_data() is written with the assumption
> that the udelay will be preempted by the tcs_tx_done() irq handler when
> the TCS slots are all full. This doesn't hold true when the calling
From: Stephen Boyd
The busy loop in rpmh_rsc_send_data() is written with the assumption
that the udelay will be preempted by the tcs_tx_done() irq handler when
the TCS slots are all full. This doesn't hold true when the calling
thread is an irqthread and the tcs_tx_done() irq is also an
6 matches
Mail list logo
