On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 07:55:19PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> The workqueue has a single workitem(>ws) and hence doesn't require
> ordering. Also, it is not being used on a memory reclaim path. Hence, the
> singlethreaded workqueue has been replaced with the use of system_wq.
>
> System
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 07:55:19PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> The workqueue has a single workitem(>ws) and hence doesn't require
> ordering. Also, it is not being used on a memory reclaim path. Hence, the
> singlethreaded workqueue has been replaced with the use of system_wq.
>
> System
The workqueue has a single workitem(>ws) and hence doesn't require
ordering. Also, it is not being used on a memory reclaim path. Hence, the
singlethreaded workqueue has been replaced with the use of system_wq.
System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
for a long time
The workqueue has a single workitem(>ws) and hence doesn't require
ordering. Also, it is not being used on a memory reclaim path. Hence, the
singlethreaded workqueue has been replaced with the use of system_wq.
System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
for a long time
4 matches
Mail list logo
