On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:56:23PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:49:10AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 08:38:42PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:29 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
> > > Linux wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:49:10AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 08:38:42PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:29 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
> > Linux wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:51 PM Paul E. McKenney
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 08:38:42PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:29 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
> Linux wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:51 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:55:48PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > On
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:29 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:51 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:55:48PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:40 PM Paul E. McKenney
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:51 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:55:48PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:40 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:25:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > The stringification
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:55:48PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:40 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:25:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > The stringification operator, `#`, in the preprocessor escapes strings.
> > > For example, `#
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:40 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:25:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > The stringification operator, `#`, in the preprocessor escapes strings.
> > For example, `# "foo"` becomes `"\"foo\""`. GCC and Clang differ in how
> > they treat
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:25:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> The stringification operator, `#`, in the preprocessor escapes strings.
> For example, `# "foo"` becomes `"\"foo\""`. GCC and Clang differ in how
> they treat section names that contain \".
>
> The portable solution is to not
On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 18:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:25 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
> Linux wrote:
> > The stringification operator, `#`, in the preprocessor escapes strings.
> > For example, `# "foo"` becomes `"\"foo\""`. GCC and Clang differ in how
> >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:25 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux wrote:
>
> The stringification operator, `#`, in the preprocessor escapes strings.
> For example, `# "foo"` becomes `"\"foo\""`. GCC and Clang differ in how
> they treat section names that contain \".
>
> The portable
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:25:49PM -0700, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux wrote:
> The stringification operator, `#`, in the preprocessor escapes strings.
> For example, `# "foo"` becomes `"\"foo\""`. GCC and Clang differ in how
> they treat section names that contain \".
>
> The
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:25:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> The stringification operator, `#`, in the preprocessor escapes strings.
> For example, `# "foo"` becomes `"\"foo\""`. GCC and Clang differ in how
> they treat section names that contain \".
>
> The portable solution is to not
The stringification operator, `#`, in the preprocessor escapes strings.
For example, `# "foo"` becomes `"\"foo\""`. GCC and Clang differ in how
they treat section names that contain \".
The portable solution is to not use a string literal with the
preprocessor stringification operator.
Link:
13 matches
Mail list logo