* Oleg Nesterov [2013-03-18 19:43:17]:
> Cleanup. Now that we have f_inode/file_inode() we can use it instead
> of ->f_mapping->host.
>
> This should not make any difference for uprobes, but in theory this
> change is more correct. We use this inode as a key, to compare it
> with uprobe->inode
* Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com [2013-03-18 19:43:17]:
Cleanup. Now that we have f_inode/file_inode() we can use it instead
of -f_mapping-host.
This should not make any difference for uprobes, but in theory this
change is more correct. We use this inode as a key, to compare it
with
Cleanup. Now that we have f_inode/file_inode() we can use it instead
of ->f_mapping->host.
This should not make any difference for uprobes, but in theory this
change is more correct. We use this inode as a key, to compare it
with uprobe->inode set by uprobe_register(inode), and the caller uses
Cleanup. Now that we have f_inode/file_inode() we can use it instead
of -f_mapping-host.
This should not make any difference for uprobes, but in theory this
change is more correct. We use this inode as a key, to compare it
with uprobe-inode set by uprobe_register(inode), and the caller uses
4 matches
Mail list logo
