On 7/29/20 8:37 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> I see that Hans is saying that he has submitted some patch here.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/65f27abc-69c8-3877-be5b-e5e478153...@redhat.com/
> But, haven't found the actual patches yet !
>
Hi Guenter,
I see that Hans is saying that he has submitted some patch here.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/65f27abc-69c8-3877-be5b-e5e478153...@redhat.com/
But, haven't found the actual patches yet !
Thanks,
Badhri
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:03 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On 7/29/20 7:28 PM,
On 7/29/20 7:28 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Sure just sent the new patch v3.
>
> Patch applies cleanly on my end. So wondering what I am missing.
I expected your patch to conflict with Hans' patch series.
Maybe those are in a different tree/branch ?
Guenter
> Just in case
Hi Greg,
Sure just sent the new patch v3.
Patch applies cleanly on my end. So wondering what I am missing.
Just in case if you are still noticing merge conflicts.
Here is the git log of my local tree:
633198cd2945b7 (HEAD -> usb-next-1) usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate
workqueue to RT priority for
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:05:51PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> "tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2
> The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond
> within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the
> sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire."
>
> When the cpu
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:05:51PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> "tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2
> The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond
> within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the
> sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire."
>
> When the cpu
On 7/23/20 7:05 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> "tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2
> The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond
> within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the
> sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire."
>
> When the cpu complex is busy
"tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2
The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond
within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the
sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire."
When the cpu complex is busy running other lower priority
work items, TCPM's work queue sometimes
8 matches
Mail list logo