Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events

2020-07-30 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 7/29/20 8:37 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > I see that Hans is saying that he has submitted some patch here. > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/65f27abc-69c8-3877-be5b-e5e478153...@redhat.com/ > But, haven't found the actual patches yet ! >

Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events

2020-07-29 Thread Badhri Jagan Sridharan
Hi Guenter, I see that Hans is saying that he has submitted some patch here. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/65f27abc-69c8-3877-be5b-e5e478153...@redhat.com/ But, haven't found the actual patches yet ! Thanks, Badhri On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:03 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 7/29/20 7:28 PM,

Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events

2020-07-29 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 7/29/20 7:28 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Sure just sent the new patch v3. > > Patch applies cleanly on my end. So wondering what I am missing. I expected your patch to conflict with Hans' patch series. Maybe those are in a different tree/branch ? Guenter > Just in case

Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events

2020-07-29 Thread Badhri Jagan Sridharan
Hi Greg, Sure just sent the new patch v3. Patch applies cleanly on my end. So wondering what I am missing. Just in case if you are still noticing merge conflicts. Here is the git log of my local tree: 633198cd2945b7 (HEAD -> usb-next-1) usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for

Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events

2020-07-29 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:05:51PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > "tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2 > The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond > within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the > sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire." > > When the cpu

Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events

2020-07-28 Thread Heikki Krogerus
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 07:05:51PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > "tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2 > The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond > within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the > sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire." > > When the cpu

Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events

2020-07-24 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 7/23/20 7:05 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > "tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2 > The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond > within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the > sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire." > > When the cpu complex is busy

[PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Migrate workqueue to RT priority for processing events

2020-07-23 Thread Badhri Jagan Sridharan
"tReceiverResponse 15 ms Section 6.6.2 The receiver of a Message requiring a response Shall respond within tReceiverResponse in order to ensure that the sender’s SenderResponseTimer does not expire." When the cpu complex is busy running other lower priority work items, TCPM's work queue sometimes