On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:24:57PM -0500, Eric Biggers wrote:
> I feel it's a small improvement as it reduces the chance of bugs. However, if
> you look at all the system calls, they are, in general, inconsistent about
> using
> 'const'. So may be right that changing just a few isn't worthwhile
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:05:24AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:51:12PM -0500, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > The system calls to set file times: utime(), utimes(), futimesat(), and
> > utimensat(), all take in pointers to a filename and time information,
> > neither of which is modi
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:51:12PM -0500, Eric Biggers wrote:
> The system calls to set file times: utime(), utimes(), futimesat(), and
> utimensat(), all take in pointers to a filename and time information,
> neither of which is modified. Mark the pointed-to data as 'const' to
> better reflect th
The system calls to set file times: utime(), utimes(), futimesat(), and
utimensat(), all take in pointers to a filename and time information,
neither of which is modified. Mark the pointed-to data as 'const' to
better reflect the semantics.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers
---
arch/alpha/kernel/osf_
4 matches
Mail list logo
