On 10/21/2014 12:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Martin Kelly wrote:
>> On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Thomas, do you see any issues with a revision that separates out the
>> return values (0 for a map with 1 entry, -1 for a map with invalid
>> entries) and
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Martin Kelly wrote:
> On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> This patch changes the behavior so that sanitize_e820_map is a void
> >> function. When the provided memory map has length 1 or it is sanitized
> >> (both ok cases), it returns nothing. If the provided
On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> This patch changes the behavior so that sanitize_e820_map is a void
>> function. When the provided memory map has length 1 or it is sanitized
>> (both ok cases), it returns nothing. If the provided memory map is
>> invalid, then it panics.
>
> So
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Martin Kelly wrote:
> sanitize_e820_map returns two possible values:
> -1: Returned when either the provided memory map has length 1 (ok) or
> when the provided memory map is invalid (not ok).
> 0: Returned when the memory map was correctly sanitized.
>
> In addition,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Martin Kelly wrote:
sanitize_e820_map returns two possible values:
-1: Returned when either the provided memory map has length 1 (ok) or
when the provided memory map is invalid (not ok).
0: Returned when the memory map was correctly sanitized.
In addition, most
On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
This patch changes the behavior so that sanitize_e820_map is a void
function. When the provided memory map has length 1 or it is sanitized
(both ok cases), it returns nothing. If the provided memory map is
invalid, then it panics.
So you break
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Martin Kelly wrote:
On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
This patch changes the behavior so that sanitize_e820_map is a void
function. When the provided memory map has length 1 or it is sanitized
(both ok cases), it returns nothing. If the provided memory map
On 10/21/2014 12:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Martin Kelly wrote:
On 10/21/2014 01:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Thomas, do you see any issues with a revision that separates out the
return values (0 for a map with 1 entry, -1 for a map with invalid
entries) and adds
sanitize_e820_map returns two possible values:
-1: Returned when either the provided memory map has length 1 (ok) or
when the provided memory map is invalid (not ok).
0: Returned when the memory map was correctly sanitized.
In addition, most code ignores the returned value, and none actually
sanitize_e820_map returns two possible values:
-1: Returned when either the provided memory map has length 1 (ok) or
when the provided memory map is invalid (not ok).
0: Returned when the memory map was correctly sanitized.
In addition, most code ignores the returned value, and none actually
10 matches
Mail list logo
