On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 15:31 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I prefer the devm semantics. insert_resource() and
> > remove_resource() are not exported interfaces. So, with
> > devm_add_action(), we still need to
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 15:31 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I prefer the devm semantics. insert_resource() and
> > remove_resource() are not exported interfaces. So, with
> > devm_add_action(), we still need to introduce built-in
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> Yes, I prefer the devm semantics. insert_resource() and remove_resource()
> are not exported interfaces. So, with devm_add_action(), we still need to
> introduce built-in exported wrappers for insert/remove_resource(),
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> Yes, I prefer the devm semantics. insert_resource() and remove_resource()
> are not exported interfaces. So, with devm_add_action(), we still need to
> introduce built-in exported wrappers for insert/remove_resource(), unless
> we change to
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 14:44 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Dan Williams > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's the usage patch from Toshi [1] (copied
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 14:44 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Dan Williams > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's the usage patch from Toshi [1] (copied below). It is indeed a
> > > resource injected by nfit /
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Dan Williams
> wrote:
>>
>> Here's the usage patch from Toshi [1] (copied below). It is indeed a
>> resource injected by nfit / nvdimm bus
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Dan Williams
> wrote:
>>
>> Here's the usage patch from Toshi [1] (copied below). It is indeed a
>> resource injected by nfit / nvdimm bus implementation. We just happen
>> to support nfit and libnvdimm
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Here's the usage patch from Toshi [1] (copied below). It is indeed a
> resource injected by nfit / nvdimm bus implementation. We just happen
> to support nfit and libnvdimm as modules.
>
> The goal of these
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Here's the usage patch from Toshi [1] (copied below). It is indeed a
> resource injected by nfit / nvdimm bus implementation. We just happen
> to support nfit and libnvdimm as modules.
>
> The goal of these patches is to use the ACPI NFIT
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>>
>> Add device-managed implementaions of insert_resource() and
>> remove_resouce() functions.
>
> Can we get an example of the users
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>>
>> Add device-managed implementaions of insert_resource() and
>> remove_resouce() functions.
>
> Can we get an example of the users and show how much this would actually help?
>
>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> Add device-managed implementaions of insert_resource() and
> remove_resouce() functions.
Can we get an example of the users and show how much this would actually help?
insert_resource() is fairly unusual to begin with,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> Add device-managed implementaions of insert_resource() and
> remove_resouce() functions.
Can we get an example of the users and show how much this would actually help?
insert_resource() is fairly unusual to begin with, and it should
* Toshi Kani wrote:
> insert_resource() and remove_resouce() are called by producers
> of resources, such as FW modules and bus drivers. These modules
> may be implemented as loadable modules.
>
> Add device-managed implementaions of insert_resource() and
>
* Toshi Kani wrote:
> insert_resource() and remove_resouce() are called by producers
> of resources, such as FW modules and bus drivers. These modules
> may be implemented as loadable modules.
>
> Add device-managed implementaions of insert_resource() and
> remove_resouce() functions.
>
>
insert_resource() and remove_resouce() are called by producers
of resources, such as FW modules and bus drivers. These modules
may be implemented as loadable modules.
Add device-managed implementaions of insert_resource() and
remove_resouce() functions.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani
insert_resource() and remove_resouce() are called by producers
of resources, such as FW modules and bus drivers. These modules
may be implemented as loadable modules.
Add device-managed implementaions of insert_resource() and
remove_resouce() functions.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani
Cc: Ingo
18 matches
Mail list logo