On 7/30/19 10:46 PM, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: John Hubbard
>
> Hi,
>
> This uses the "save each field explicitly" approach that we discussed
> during the first review [1]. As in [1], this is motivated by a desire
> to clear the compiler warnings when building with gcc 9.
>
> This
From: John Hubbard
Hi,
This uses the "save each field explicitly" approach that we discussed
during the first review [1]. As in [1], this is motivated by a desire
to clear the compiler warnings when building with gcc 9.
This is difficult to properly test. I've done a basic boot test, but
if
2 matches
Mail list logo