Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 12:20:38AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:05 AM Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:11:44PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > Masahiro, if there no

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:05 AM Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:11:44PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > Masahiro, if there no issues feel free to take this or I can take them in > > > too via the

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:11:44PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > Masahiro, if there no issues feel free to take this or I can take them in > > too via the modules-next tree. Lemme know! > > I've queued this onto

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > Masahiro, if there no issues feel free to take this or I can take them in > too via the modules-next tree. Lemme know! I've queued this onto modules-testing to get winder testing [0] [0]

[PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

Helge Deller had written a series of patches to fix a few misalignemnt annotations in the kernel [0]. Three of these patches were tagged as being stable candidates. Because of these annotation I suggested proof of the imapact, however we did not easily have a way to verify the value / impact of