Hello,
it looks like I didn't even manage to correctly CC the device tree
maintainers and list, which was the main reason for sending out this
second roll. This is getting embarrassing, but I guess I will simply
prepare a 3rd roll and try even harder to send it to the right people
this time
Hello,
it looks like I didn't even manage to correctly CC the device tree
maintainers and list, which was the main reason for sending out this
second roll. This is getting embarrassing, but I guess I will simply
prepare a 3rd roll and try even harder to send it to the right people
this time
Apologies, again, I seem not to be able to handle git-send-mail
correctly, the cover letter got lost in operation (using get_maintainers
on a cover letter is not a good idea). Here it is again:
Hi everybody,
when porting my router board from a mach-file based OpenWRT target to a
device-tree
Apologies, again, I seem not to be able to handle git-send-mail
correctly, the cover letter got lost in operation (using get_maintainers
on a cover letter is not a good idea). Here it is again:
Hi everybody,
when porting my router board from a mach-file based OpenWRT target to a
device-tree
Hi everybody,
when porting my router board from a mach-file based OpenWRT target to a
device-tree based target, I found that there is no generic way to create
a mtd_concat device from within the dts. The following patches attempt
to provide that possibility.
This is a second roll of that patch
Hi everybody,
when porting my router board from a mach-file based OpenWRT target to a
device-tree based target, I found that there is no generic way to create
a mtd_concat device from within the dts. The following patches attempt
to provide that possibility.
This is a second roll of that patch
6 matches
Mail list logo
