Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-05-15 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (20/05/01 11:46), John Ogness wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a v2 for the first series to rework the printk subsystem. The > v1 and history are here [0]. This first series only replaces the > existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking is removed. No > semantics/behavior of printk are changed.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-05-13 Thread Prarit Bhargava
On 5/1/20 5:40 AM, John Ogness wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a v2 for the first series to rework the printk subsystem. The > v1 and history are here [0]. This first series only replaces the > existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking is removed. No > semantics/behavior of printk are

[PATCH v2 0/3] printk: replace ringbuffer

2020-05-01 Thread John Ogness
Hello, Here is a v2 for the first series to rework the printk subsystem. The v1 and history are here [0]. This first series only replaces the existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking is removed. No semantics/behavior of printk are changed. The VMCOREINFO is updated. RFC patches for the