On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 14:58 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 29.10.2015 01:51, Toshi Kani пишет:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:22 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:34 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
:
> > > I looked at the dosemu code and was able to reproduce the issue with a
> > >
On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 14:58 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 29.10.2015 01:51, Toshi Kani пишет:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:22 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:34 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
:
> > > I looked at the dosemu code and was able to reproduce the issue with a
> > >
29.10.2015 01:51, Toshi Kani пишет:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:22 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:34 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
29.10.2015 01:51, Toshi Kani пишет:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:22 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:34 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 27.10.2015 03:52, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>> 26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
thought, this is not
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 27.10.2015 03:52, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>> 26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:22 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:34 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > > 28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Oct
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:34 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > 28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> >
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear -
> >
28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>>
>>> I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear -
>>> machine freezes immediately, and under non-KMS console it is
>>>
28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>>
>>> I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear -
>>> machine freezes immediately, and under non-KMS console it
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:34 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > 28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev
> > > > wrote:
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:22 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:34 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 12:53 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > > 28.10.2015 03:04, Toshi Kani пишет:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Oct
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >
> > I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear -
> > machine freezes immediately, and under non-KMS console it is
> > possible to get one, but difficult to
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>
> I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear -
> machine freezes immediately, and under non-KMS console it is
> possible to get one, but difficult to screen-shot (using bare
> metal, not VM). Also the Oops was seemingly
27.10.2015 03:52, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>>> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
>>> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
>>> to avoid
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>
> I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear -
> machine freezes immediately, and under non-KMS console it is
> possible to get one, but difficult to screen-shot (using bare
> metal, not VM). Also the Oops was
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 07:37 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >
> > I can't easily post an Oops: under X it doesn't even appear -
> > machine freezes immediately, and under non-KMS console it is
> > possible to get one, but
27.10.2015 03:52, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>>> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
>>> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
>> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
>> to avoid opt-in behavior. Instead, it just tries hard
26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
> to avoid opt-in behavior. Instead, it just tries hard to avoid
> triggering the cases that break DOSEMU.
>
>
26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
> to avoid opt-in behavior. Instead, it just tries hard to avoid
> triggering the cases that break DOSEMU.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
>> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
>> to avoid opt-in behavior. Instead, it
This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
to avoid opt-in behavior. Instead, it just tries hard to avoid
triggering the cases that break DOSEMU.
Stas, this now seems to pass the test you sent me. It
This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
to avoid opt-in behavior. Instead, it just tries hard to avoid
triggering the cases that break DOSEMU.
Stas, this now seems to pass the test you sent me. It
26 matches
Mail list logo