Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] i2c: move handling of suspended adapters to the core

2018-12-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 26-12-18 12:01, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Wolfram, On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 9:26 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: Here is the new version without specific I2C helpers but using the 'is_suspended' flag from the PM core. I didn't like messing with the flag directly, so I did a helper in patch

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] i2c: move handling of suspended adapters to the core

2018-12-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Wolfram, On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 9:26 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > Here is the new version without specific I2C helpers but using the > 'is_suspended' flag from the PM core. I didn't like messing with the > flag directly, so I did a helper in patch 1. So far, I like the > approach. The diffstat

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] i2c: move handling of suspended adapters to the core

2018-12-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 22-12-18 21:26, Wolfram Sang wrote: Here is the new version without specific I2C helpers but using the 'is_suspended' flag from the PM core. I didn't like messing with the flag directly, so I did a helper in patch 1. So far, I like the approach. The diffstat looks nice, and i2c-rcar.c

[PATCH v2 0/9] i2c: move handling of suspended adapters to the core

2018-12-22 Thread Wolfram Sang
Here is the new version without specific I2C helpers but using the 'is_suspended' flag from the PM core. I didn't like messing with the flag directly, so I did a helper in patch 1. So far, I like the approach. The diffstat looks nice, and i2c-rcar.c and i2c-sh_mobile.c rejected rightfully too