Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mtd: migrate 'of_node' handling to core, not in mtd_part_parser_data

2015-11-01 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:33:19 -0700 Brian Norris wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that, for MTD drivers that want to support DT partition parsing > (essentially all recent ones), it's a bit awkward to set the tell MTD which DT > node to use. I also noticed that this info is duplicated in a few places;

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mtd: migrate 'of_node' handling to core, not in mtd_part_parser_data

2015-11-01 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:33:19 -0700 Brian Norris wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that, for MTD drivers that want to support DT partition parsing > (essentially all recent ones), it's a bit awkward to set the tell MTD which DT > node to use. I also noticed that this info

[PATCH v2 00/11] mtd: migrate 'of_node' handling to core, not in mtd_part_parser_data

2015-10-30 Thread Brian Norris
Hi, I noticed that, for MTD drivers that want to support DT partition parsing (essentially all recent ones), it's a bit awkward to set the tell MTD which DT node to use. I also noticed that this info is duplicated in a few places; namely, some sub-subsystems (like SPI NOR and NAND) need their own

[PATCH v2 00/11] mtd: migrate 'of_node' handling to core, not in mtd_part_parser_data

2015-10-30 Thread Brian Norris
Hi, I noticed that, for MTD drivers that want to support DT partition parsing (essentially all recent ones), it's a bit awkward to set the tell MTD which DT node to use. I also noticed that this info is duplicated in a few places; namely, some sub-subsystems (like SPI NOR and NAND) need their own