On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:33:19 -0700
Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that, for MTD drivers that want to support DT partition parsing
> (essentially all recent ones), it's a bit awkward to set the tell MTD which DT
> node to use. I also noticed that this info is duplicated in a few places;
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:33:19 -0700
Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that, for MTD drivers that want to support DT partition parsing
> (essentially all recent ones), it's a bit awkward to set the tell MTD which DT
> node to use. I also noticed that this info
Hi,
I noticed that, for MTD drivers that want to support DT partition parsing
(essentially all recent ones), it's a bit awkward to set the tell MTD which DT
node to use. I also noticed that this info is duplicated in a few places;
namely, some sub-subsystems (like SPI NOR and NAND) need their own
Hi,
I noticed that, for MTD drivers that want to support DT partition parsing
(essentially all recent ones), it's a bit awkward to set the tell MTD which DT
node to use. I also noticed that this info is duplicated in a few places;
namely, some sub-subsystems (like SPI NOR and NAND) need their own
4 matches
Mail list logo