Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Hi Boris, On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:31:06 +0100 > Boris Brezillon wrote: > >> Hi Peter, >> >> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:18:39 +0800 >> 潘栋 wrote: >> >> > Hi Boris and Ezequiel, >> > >> > 2015-12-29 23:11 GMT+08:00 Boris Brezillon >> > : >> >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:31:06 +0100 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:18:39 +0800 > 潘栋 wrote: > > > Hi Boris and Ezequiel, > > > > 2015-12-29 23:11 GMT+08:00 Boris Brezillon > > : > > > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:07:50 -0300 > > > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > > > >>

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:31:06 +0100 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:18:39 +0800 > 潘栋 wrote: > > > Hi Boris and Ezequiel, > > > > 2015-12-29 23:11 GMT+08:00 Boris Brezillon > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Hi Boris, On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:31:06 +0100 > Boris Brezillon wrote: > >> Hi Peter, >> >> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:18:39 +0800 >> 潘栋 wrote:

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Hi Peter, On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:18:39 +0800 潘栋 wrote: > Hi Boris and Ezequiel, > > 2015-12-29 23:11 GMT+08:00 Boris Brezillon > : > > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:07:50 -0300 > > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > >> On 29 December 2015 at 06:35, Boris Brezillon > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Hi Peter, On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:18:39 +0800 潘栋 wrote: > Hi Boris and Ezequiel, > > 2015-12-29 23:11 GMT+08:00 Boris Brezillon > : > > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:07:50 -0300 > > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Hi Boris and Ezequiel, 2015-12-29 23:11 GMT+08:00 Boris Brezillon : > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:07:50 -0300 > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> On 29 December 2015 at 06:35, Boris Brezillon >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:42:50 -0300 >> > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> > >> >> This is

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:07:50 -0300 Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 29 December 2015 at 06:35, Boris Brezillon > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:42:50 -0300 > > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > >> This is looking a lot better, thanks for the good work! > >> > >> On 15 December 2015 at

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

On 29 December 2015 at 06:35, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:42:50 -0300 > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> This is looking a lot better, thanks for the good work! >> >> On 15 December 2015 at 02:59, Peter Pan wrote: >> > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip,

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Hi, On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:42:50 -0300 Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > This is looking a lot better, thanks for the good work! > > On 15 December 2015 at 02:59, Peter Pan wrote: > > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other > > NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c.

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Hi Boris and Ezequiel, 2015-12-29 23:11 GMT+08:00 Boris Brezillon : > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:07:50 -0300 > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> On 29 December 2015 at 06:35, Boris Brezillon >> wrote:

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Hi, On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:42:50 -0300 Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > This is looking a lot better, thanks for the good work! > > On 15 December 2015 at 02:59, Peter Pan wrote: > > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

On 29 December 2015 at 06:35, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:42:50 -0300 > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> This is looking a lot better, thanks for the good work! >> >> On 15 December 2015 at 02:59, Peter Pan

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:07:50 -0300 Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 29 December 2015 at 06:35, Boris Brezillon > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:42:50 -0300 > > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

This is looking a lot better, thanks for the good work! On 15 December 2015 at 02:59, Peter Pan wrote: > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other > NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why > onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c). > > Separate

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

This is looking a lot better, thanks for the good work! On 15 December 2015 at 02:59, Peter Pan wrote: > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other > NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why > onenand has own

[PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c). Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code can make current BBT shareable. We create struct nand_bbt to take place of

[PATCH v2 00/12] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT

Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c). Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code can make current BBT shareable. We create struct nand_bbt to take place of