Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-29 Thread boris brezillon
On 29/07/2013 17:09, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/29 boris brezillon : On 29/07/2013 16:18, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/29 boris brezillon : On 29/07/2013 10:00, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/26 boris brezillon : On 26/07/2013 17:44, boris brezillon wrote: I found 2 bugs: 1) the main frequen

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-29 Thread boris brezillon
On 29/07/2013 17:09, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/29 boris brezillon : On 29/07/2013 16:18, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/29 boris brezillon : On 29/07/2013 10:00, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/26 boris brezillon : On 26/07/2013 17:44, boris brezillon wrote: I found 2 bugs: 1) the main frequen

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-29 Thread Richard Genoud
2013/7/29 boris brezillon : > On 29/07/2013 16:18, Richard Genoud wrote: >> >> 2013/7/29 boris brezillon : >>> >>> On 29/07/2013 10:00, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/26 boris brezillon : > > On 26/07/2013 17:44, boris brezillon wrote: > I found 2 bugs: > 1) the main frequen

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-29 Thread boris brezillon
On 29/07/2013 16:18, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/29 boris brezillon : On 29/07/2013 10:00, Richard Genoud wrote: 2013/7/26 boris brezillon : On 26/07/2013 17:44, boris brezillon wrote: I found 2 bugs: 1) the main frequency ready test in recalc_rate function is wrong 2) the common clk framewor

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-29 Thread Richard Genoud
2013/7/29 boris brezillon : > On 29/07/2013 10:00, Richard Genoud wrote: >> >> 2013/7/26 boris brezillon : >>> >>> On 26/07/2013 17:44, boris brezillon wrote: >>> I found 2 bugs: >>> 1) the main frequency ready test in recalc_rate function is wrong >>> 2) the common clk framework uses the first mat

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-29 Thread Richard Genoud
2013/7/26 boris brezillon : > On 26/07/2013 17:44, boris brezillon wrote: > I found 2 bugs: > 1) the main frequency ready test in recalc_rate function is wrong > 2) the common clk framework uses the first match for dt clk registration >and main clk has this compatible property: >compatible

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-26 Thread boris brezillon
Hello, This email is a feedback on the discussion I had with Jean-Christophe last Wednesday. As discussed with him, I will try to split this patch series in order to 1) limit the number of patches to review 2) limit the number of SoCs/boards to test The new at91 clk support on non-dt boards

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-26 Thread boris brezillon
On 26/07/2013 17:44, boris brezillon wrote: On 26/07/2013 16:10, Richard Genoud wrote: On 17/07/2013 15:34, Boris BREZILLON wrote: Hello, This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation to common clk framework. Most of the clock provided by the PMC (Power Management Controll

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-26 Thread boris brezillon
On 26/07/2013 16:10, Richard Genoud wrote: On 17/07/2013 15:34, Boris BREZILLON wrote: Hello, This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation to common clk framework. Most of the clock provided by the PMC (Power Management Controller) are implemented : - main clock (main osci

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-26 Thread Richard Genoud
On 17/07/2013 15:34, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > Hello, > > This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation > to common clk framework. > > Most of the clock provided by the PMC (Power Management Controller) are > implemented : > - main clock (main oscillator) > - pll clocks > - mas

Re: [PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-18 Thread boris brezillon
On 17/07/2013 15:34, Boris BREZILLON wrote: Hello, This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation to common clk framework. Most of the clock provided by the PMC (Power Management Controller) are implemented : - main clock (main oscillator) - pll clocks - master clock - progra

[PATCH v2 00/42] ARM: at91: move to common clk framework

2013-07-17 Thread Boris BREZILLON
Hello, This patch series is a proposal to move at91 clock implementation to common clk framework. Most of the clock provided by the PMC (Power Management Controller) are implemented : - main clock (main oscillator) - pll clocks - master clock - programmable clocks - utmi clock - peripheral clocks