On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:24:05PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2013, at 10:01 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:55:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM
On Sep 8, 2013, at 10:01 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:55:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
If the desc is the last one and it is full, its
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:55:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
> >>
> > Hmm, if desc is not full
On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
>>
> Hmm, if desc is not full but it is not the last one all sptes after the
> desc are not counted too.
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
>
Hmm, if desc is not full but it is not the last one all sptes after the
desc are not counted too.
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
Hmm, if desc is not full but it is not the last one all sptes after the
desc are not counted too.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
Hmm, if desc is not full but it is not the last one all sptes after the
desc are not counted
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:55:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
Hmm, if desc is not
On Sep 8, 2013, at 10:01 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:55:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
If the desc is the last one and
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:24:05PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On Sep 8, 2013, at 10:01 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:55:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at
If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 6e2d2c8..7714fd8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 6e2d2c8..7714fd8 100644
---
12 matches
Mail list logo