On 05/12/12 22:28, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:08:24 +, James Hogan wrote:
>> The "powervr" prefix which is currently described as "Imagination
>> Technologies" isn't really appropriate for non-PowerVR hardware, so
>> deprecate it, changing the description of "powervr" to
On 05/12/12 22:28, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:08:24 +, James Hogan james.ho...@imgtec.com wrote:
The powervr prefix which is currently described as Imagination
Technologies isn't really appropriate for non-PowerVR hardware, so
deprecate it, changing the description of
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:08:24 +, James Hogan wrote:
> The "powervr" prefix which is currently described as "Imagination
> Technologies" isn't really appropriate for non-PowerVR hardware, so
> deprecate it, changing the description of "powervr" to "PowerVR
> (deprecated, use img)", and add a
The "powervr" prefix which is currently described as "Imagination
Technologies" isn't really appropriate for non-PowerVR hardware, so
deprecate it, changing the description of "powervr" to "PowerVR
(deprecated, use img)", and add a separate "img" prefix for "Imagination
Technologies Ltd.".
The powervr prefix which is currently described as Imagination
Technologies isn't really appropriate for non-PowerVR hardware, so
deprecate it, changing the description of powervr to PowerVR
(deprecated, use img), and add a separate img prefix for Imagination
Technologies Ltd..
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:08:24 +, James Hogan james.ho...@imgtec.com wrote:
The powervr prefix which is currently described as Imagination
Technologies isn't really appropriate for non-PowerVR hardware, so
deprecate it, changing the description of powervr to PowerVR
(deprecated, use img), and
6 matches
Mail list logo