On 10/26/2014 09:52 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On some chips it is possible to access the switch eeprom.
Add infrastructure support for it.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
[ ... ]
@@ -603,6 +604,9 @@ static int dsa_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (pd->nr_chips >
On 10/26/2014 09:52 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On some chips it is possible to access the switch eeprom.
Add infrastructure support for it.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
---
[ ... ]
@@ -603,6 +604,9 @@ static int dsa_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:59:17PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > So lets take a step back: For the Marvell chips, I have to provide both
> > length
> > and presence in devicetree or platform data. Presence seemed to be implied
> > by
> > length, so I used only a single property and variable to
> So lets take a step back: For the Marvell chips, I have to provide both length
> and presence in devicetree or platform data. Presence seemed to be implied by
> length, so I used only a single property and variable to indicate both.
Hi Guenter
What i was thinking, is that you don't need length
On 10/27/2014 01:50 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 08:56:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Also, it seems that you request two separate properties, one for presence
and another for length. Is that correct ? Again, I thought that would not
provide any value since presence is
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 08:56:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Also, it seems that you request two separate properties, one for presence
> and another for length. Is that correct ? Again, I thought that would not
> provide any value since presence is indicated by length != 0 in the ethtool
>
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 08:56:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Also, it seems that you request two separate properties, one for presence
and another for length. Is that correct ? Again, I thought that would not
provide any value since presence is indicated by length != 0 in the ethtool
On 10/27/2014 01:50 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 08:56:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Also, it seems that you request two separate properties, one for presence
and another for length. Is that correct ? Again, I thought that would not
provide any value since presence is
So lets take a step back: For the Marvell chips, I have to provide both length
and presence in devicetree or platform data. Presence seemed to be implied by
length, so I used only a single property and variable to indicate both.
Hi Guenter
What i was thinking, is that you don't need length in
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:59:17PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
So lets take a step back: For the Marvell chips, I have to provide both
length
and presence in devicetree or platform data. Presence seemed to be implied
by
length, so I used only a single property and variable to indicate
On 10/26/2014 07:41 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:52:39AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On some chips it is possible to access the switch eeprom.
Add infrastructure support for it.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
v2:
- Add support for configuring switch EEPROM size through
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:52:39AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On some chips it is possible to access the switch eeprom.
> Add infrastructure support for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
> ---
> v2:
> - Add support for configuring switch EEPROM size through platform data
> or devicetree
On some chips it is possible to access the switch eeprom.
Add infrastructure support for it.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
v2:
- Add support for configuring switch EEPROM size through platform data
or devicetree data
- Do not compare new pointers against NULL
- Check if get_eeprom pointer
On some chips it is possible to access the switch eeprom.
Add infrastructure support for it.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
---
v2:
- Add support for configuring switch EEPROM size through platform data
or devicetree data
- Do not compare new pointers against NULL
- Check if
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:52:39AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On some chips it is possible to access the switch eeprom.
Add infrastructure support for it.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
---
v2:
- Add support for configuring switch EEPROM size through platform data
or
On 10/26/2014 07:41 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:52:39AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On some chips it is possible to access the switch eeprom.
Add infrastructure support for it.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net
---
v2:
- Add support for configuring switch
16 matches
Mail list logo
