On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:28:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> create_irq() will return -1 when fail to allocate.
.. failing to allocate
> create_irq_nr() will return 0 when fail to allocate.
.. failing..
>
> It only causes confusing.
confusion.
>
> Now we have no user for create_irq(), so
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:28:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
create_irq() will return -1 when fail to allocate.
.. failing to allocate
create_irq_nr() will return 0 when fail to allocate.
.. failing..
It only causes confusing.
confusion.
Now we have no user for create_irq(), so remove
create_irq() will return -1 when fail to allocate.
create_irq_nr() will return 0 when fail to allocate.
It only causes confusing.
Now we have no user for create_irq(), so remove create_irq() for x86.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu
Cc: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej
create_irq() will return -1 when fail to allocate.
create_irq_nr() will return 0 when fail to allocate.
It only causes confusing.
Now we have no user for create_irq(), so remove create_irq() for x86.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org
Cc: Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org
Cc: Konrad
4 matches
Mail list logo