Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial power state to a separate function

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On 10/28/2016 04:27 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 13:01 +0300 schrieb Peter Ujfalusi: >> Move the checks to select the initial state for the backlight to a new >> function and document the checks we are doing. >> >> At the same time correct the handling

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial power state to a separate function

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On 10/28/2016 04:27 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 13:01 +0300 schrieb Peter Ujfalusi: >> Move the checks to select the initial state for the backlight to a new >> function and document the checks we are doing. >> >> At the same time correct the handling

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial power state to a separate function

2016-10-28 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi Peter, Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 13:01 +0300 schrieb Peter Ujfalusi: > Move the checks to select the initial state for the backlight to a new > function and document the checks we are doing. > > At the same time correct the handling of the case when the GPIO is > initially configured as

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial power state to a separate function

2016-10-28 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi Peter, Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2016, 13:01 +0300 schrieb Peter Ujfalusi: > Move the checks to select the initial state for the backlight to a new > function and document the checks we are doing. > > At the same time correct the handling of the case when the GPIO is > initially configured as