On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:47:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> [Snip Benjamin's proposal; I agree we don't really want a multi-level DT
> layout purely for making the driver look a little nicer (I'm
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:47:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> [Snip Benjamin's proposal; I agree we don't really want a multi-level DT
> layout purely for making the driver look a little nicer (I'm not sure
> this would really
Hi all,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:47:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
[Snip Benjamin's proposal; I agree we don't really want a multi-level DT
layout purely for making the driver look a little nicer (I'm not sure
this would really be nicer anyway). And I think, as Rob notes here, our
disagreement
Hi all,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:47:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
[Snip Benjamin's proposal; I agree we don't really want a multi-level DT
layout purely for making the driver look a little nicer (I'm not sure
this would really be nicer anyway). And I think, as Rob notes here, our
disagreement
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> On Dec 12 2016 or thereabouts, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> Given the timing (merge window being open) and given then NACK given by
>> Rob, I've now unapplied the patches (the for-4.10/i2c-hid branch is now
>>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> On Dec 12 2016 or thereabouts, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> Given the timing (merge window being open) and given then NACK given by
>> Rob, I've now unapplied the patches (the for-4.10/i2c-hid branch is now
>> obsolete, and has been superseded
On Dec 12 2016 or thereabouts, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Given the timing (merge window being open) and given then NACK given by
> Rob, I've now unapplied the patches (the for-4.10/i2c-hid branch is now
> obsolete, and has been superseded by for-4.10/i2c-hid-nopower).
>
> However, this is mostly
On Dec 12 2016 or thereabouts, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Given the timing (merge window being open) and given then NACK given by
> Rob, I've now unapplied the patches (the for-4.10/i2c-hid branch is now
> obsolete, and has been superseded by for-4.10/i2c-hid-nopower).
>
> However, this is mostly
Given the timing (merge window being open) and given then NACK given by
Rob, I've now unapplied the patches (the for-4.10/i2c-hid branch is now
obsolete, and has been superseded by for-4.10/i2c-hid-nopower).
However, this is mostly done in order to provide more time for discussion;
I still
Given the timing (merge window being open) and given then NACK given by
Rob, I've now unapplied the patches (the for-4.10/i2c-hid branch is now
obsolete, and has been superseded by for-4.10/i2c-hid-nopower).
However, this is mostly done in order to provide more time for discussion;
I still
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Just my $0.02. Feel free to ignore.
>>>
>>> One thought is that I would say that the need to power on the device
>>> explicitly seems
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Just my $0.02. Feel free to ignore.
>>>
>>> One thought is that I would say that the need to power on the device
>>> explicitly seems more like a board level difference and
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>>> > And if tomorrow there is Elan device that is drop-in compatible (same
>>> > connector, etc) with
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>>> > And if tomorrow there is Elan device that is drop-in compatible (same
>>> > connector, etc) with Wacom i2c-hid, will you ask for
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Just my $0.02. Feel free to ignore.
>>
>> One thought is that I would say that the need to power on the device
>> explicitly seems more like a board level difference and less like a
>> difference associated with a
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Just my $0.02. Feel free to ignore.
>>
>> One thought is that I would say that the need to power on the device
>> explicitly seems more like a board level difference and less like a
>> difference associated with a particular digitizer.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> > And if tomorrow there is Elan device that is drop-in compatible (same
>> > connector, etc) with Wacom i2c-hid, will you ask for Elan-specific
>> > binding? Atmel? Weida? They all
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> > And if tomorrow there is Elan device that is drop-in compatible (same
>> > connector, etc) with Wacom i2c-hid, will you ask for Elan-specific
>> > binding? Atmel? Weida? They all need to be powered
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:26:41AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
>> wrote:
>> > On December 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM PST, Rob Herring
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:26:41AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
>> wrote:
>> > On December 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM PST, Rob Herring wrote:
>> >>On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> > And if tomorrow there is Elan device that is drop-in compatible (same
> > connector, etc) with Wacom i2c-hid, will you ask for Elan-specific
> > binding? Atmel? Weida? They all need to be powered up ultimately.
>
> Yes, I will.
What advantage does
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> > And if tomorrow there is Elan device that is drop-in compatible (same
> > connector, etc) with Wacom i2c-hid, will you ask for Elan-specific
> > binding? Atmel? Weida? They all need to be powered up ultimately.
>
> Yes, I will.
What advantage does
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:26:41AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> > On December 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM PST, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:26:41AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
> > On December 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM PST, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> On December 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM PST, Rob Herring wrote:
>>On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
>> wrote:
>>> On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> On December 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM PST, Rob Herring wrote:
>>On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
>> wrote:
>>> On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring
On December 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM PST, Rob Herring wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
> wrote:
>> On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring
On December 8, 2016 8:03:06 AM PST, Rob Herring wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
> wrote:
>> On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
>> >
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
>> wrote:
>>> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
>> wrote:
>>> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris
On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
> > wrote:
> >> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On Thu,
On Dec 06 2016 or thereabouts, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
> > wrote:
> >> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
> wrote:
>> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> > Hi
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
> wrote:
>> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> > Hi Benjamin and Rob,
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > Hi Benjamin and Rob,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > Hi Benjamin and Rob,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>> > > On Nov 30
On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin and Rob,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > From: Caesar Wang
On Dec 05 2016 or thereabouts, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin and Rob,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > From: Caesar Wang
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:59:08PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin and Rob,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > From:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:59:08PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin and Rob,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > From:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Benjamin and Rob,
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > From: Caesar Wang
> > >
> > > Add a compatible string
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Benjamin and Rob,
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > From: Caesar Wang
> > >
> > > Add a compatible string and regulator property
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:42:48PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:21:27PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Caesar Wang
> >
> > Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
> > digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:42:48PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:21:27PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Caesar Wang
> >
> > Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
> > digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be enabled before using it.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:21:27PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Caesar Wang
>
> Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
> digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be enabled before using it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:21:27PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Caesar Wang
>
> Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
> digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be enabled before using it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Jiri Kosina
> Cc:
Hi Benjamin and Rob,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Caesar Wang
> >
> > Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
> > digitizer. Its VDD supply may need
Hi Benjamin and Rob,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Caesar Wang
> >
> > Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
> > digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be enabled before
On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Caesar Wang
>
> Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
> digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be enabled before using it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
> Cc: Rob
On Nov 30 2016 or thereabouts, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Caesar Wang
>
> Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
> digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be enabled before using it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Jiri Kosina
> Cc:
From: Caesar Wang
Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be enabled before using it.
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Jiri Kosina
Cc:
From: Caesar Wang
Add a compatible string and regulator property for Wacom W9103
digitizer. Its VDD supply may need to be enabled before using it.
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Jiri Kosina
Cc: linux-in...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris
---
v1 was a few months
54 matches
Mail list logo