On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:38:07 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Wed 01 Mar 2017 09:22:24 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Hans-Christian,
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100
> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:38:07 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Wed 01 Mar 2017 09:22:24 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Hans-Christian,
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100
> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> >
> >> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017
Hi Hans-Christian,
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
>
Hi Hans-Christian,
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> >> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or
Around Wed 01 Mar 2017 09:22:24 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Hans-Christian,
>
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100
> Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
>
>> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> > On Fri, 24
Around Wed 01 Mar 2017 09:22:24 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Hans-Christian,
>
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100
> Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
>
>> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 24/02/2017 at 10:04:35 +0100, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
>> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
>> >
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 24/02/2017 at 10:04:35 +0100, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
>> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
>> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> I
Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
>> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100
Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
>> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren
On 24/02/2017 at 10:04:35 +0100, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> >> OK, I will try to prepare it during the
On 24/02/2017 at 10:04:35 +0100, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> >> OK, I will try to prepare it during the weekend.
> >>
> >> Any
Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
>> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> A few weeks ago, I was telling Boris to let it not
Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
>> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> A few weeks ago, I was telling Boris to let it not build for a while and
>> then remove it.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> >> Around Fri 24
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:04:35 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:55:09 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
> > Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> >> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris
Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
> wrote:
>> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM,
Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
> wrote:
>> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
>> >
On 24/02/2017 at 09:14:30 +0100, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> > wrote:
> >> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy
On 24/02/2017 at 09:14:30 +0100, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> > wrote:
> >> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>
>
> >> A few
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
> > wrote:
> >> Around Thu 23
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:52:09 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Fri 24 Feb 2017 09:27:42 +0100 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
> > wrote:
> >> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard
Hi Hans-Cristrian,
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> >
Hi Hans-Cristrian,
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:14:30 +0100
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
> Around Thu 23 Feb 2017 21:18:13 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
> > wrote:
> >> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >> Come on, v4.10 has just been release and
>>
>> It doesn't build anymore. And current case even worse
>> Face it. It's dead.
>>
>
> I
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >> Come on, v4.10 has just been release and
>>
>> It doesn't build anymore. And current case even worse
>> Face it. It's dead.
>>
>
> I agree it hasn't seen any significant
On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> Come on, v4.10 has just been release and
>
> It doesn't build anymore. And current case even worse
> Face it. It's dead.
>
I agree it hasn't seen any significant development in a while but I'm
not the on able to take that decision.
A
On 21/02/2017 at 18:43:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> Come on, v4.10 has just been release and
>
> It doesn't build anymore. And current case even worse
> Face it. It's dead.
>
I agree it hasn't seen any significant development in a while but I'm
not the on able to take that decision.
A
On 21/02/2017 at 18:32:26 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> I did it ~year or so before where another relocation bug was discovered
> (fixed).
>
> > please feel free to
> > send a patch to remove the whole architecture.
> > The benefits for atmel will be: proper big endian support, removal of
> >
On 21/02/2017 at 18:32:26 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> I did it ~year or so before where another relocation bug was discovered
> (fixed).
>
> > please feel free to
> > send a patch to remove the whole architecture.
> > The benefits for atmel will be: proper big endian support, removal of
> >
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
>> On 21/02/2017 at 18:09:09 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
>> On 21/02/2017 at 18:09:09 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 21/02/2017 at 18:09:09 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
>> wrote:
>> > On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 21/02/2017 at 18:09:09 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
>> wrote:
>> > On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >> Abusing platform data with pointers is also not
On 21/02/2017 at 18:09:09 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
> > (adding Hans-Christian)
> >
> > On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> Abusing platform data with pointers is also
On 21/02/2017 at 18:09:09 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
> > (adding Hans-Christian)
> >
> > On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> Abusing platform data with pointers is also not welcome.
> >>
> >> > (in this
On 21/02/2017 at 17:55:15 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > And how do you do with new drivers?
>
> To be more pedantic the new drivers do not have "minus" thousands LOC.
Because all the "minus" are located in the same file (the one that
disappear), they can be safely ignored. So it is basically
On 21/02/2017 at 17:55:15 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > And how do you do with new drivers?
>
> To be more pedantic the new drivers do not have "minus" thousands LOC.
Because all the "minus" are located in the same file (the one that
disappear), they can be safely ignored. So it is basically
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> (adding Hans-Christian)
>
> On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Abusing platform data with pointers is also not welcome.
>>
>> > (in this case, avr32).
>>
>> It's dead de
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> (adding Hans-Christian)
>
> On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Abusing platform data with pointers is also not welcome.
>>
>> > (in this case, avr32).
>>
>> It's dead de facto.
>>
>> When last time did you compile
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:02:21 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Boris Brezillon
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 21
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:02:21 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Boris Brezillon
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
>> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> So, it's a matter of taste.
Yes, and I'm
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:02:21PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> >> 1. For example,
> >>
> >> #define
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:02:21PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> >> 1. For example,
> >>
> >> #define ATMEL_NFC_CMD(pos, cmd)((cmd) <<
> >>
Le 21/02/2017 à 12:20, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
>>> (in this case, avr32).
>> It's dead de facto.
>>
>> When last time did you compile kernel for it? What was the version of kernel?
>> Did it get successfully?
Alexandre answered to this one.
>> When are we going to remove avr32 support from
Le 21/02/2017 à 12:20, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
>>> (in this case, avr32).
>> It's dead de facto.
>>
>> When last time did you compile kernel for it? What was the version of kernel?
>> Did it get successfully?
Alexandre answered to this one.
>> When are we going to remove avr32 support from
Le 20/02/2017 à 13:28, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> This is a complete rewrite of the driver whose main purpose is to
> support the new DT representation where the NAND controller node is now
> really visible in the DT and appears under the EBI bus. With this new
> representation, we can add other
Le 20/02/2017 à 13:28, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> This is a complete rewrite of the driver whose main purpose is to
> support the new DT representation where the NAND controller node is now
> really visible in the DT and appears under the EBI bus. With this new
> representation, we can add other
(adding Hans-Christian)
On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Abusing platform data with pointers is also not welcome.
>
> > (in this case, avr32).
>
> It's dead de facto.
>
> When last time did you compile kernel for it? What was the version of kernel?
> Did it get
(adding Hans-Christian)
On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Abusing platform data with pointers is also not welcome.
>
> > (in this case, avr32).
>
> It's dead de facto.
>
> When last time did you compile kernel for it? What was the version of kernel?
> Did it get
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:02:21 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> >> 1. For
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:02:21 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> >> 1. For example,
> >>
> >> #define ATMEL_NFC_CMD(pos, cmd)((cmd) <<
> >>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> 1. For example,
>>
>> #define ATMEL_NFC_CMD(pos, cmd)((cmd) <<
>> (((pos) * 8) + 2))
>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> 1. For example,
>>
>> #define ATMEL_NFC_CMD(pos, cmd)((cmd) <<
>> (((pos) * 8) + 2))
>
> Well, I like to explicitly put parenthesis even when
Le 21/02/2017 à 11:26, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
>>> Andy
Le 21/02/2017 à 11:26, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
>>> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue,
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:03:45 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 20,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Boris Brezillon
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
>>
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Boris Brezillon
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 20 Feb
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Boris Brezillon
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
> >> Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
>> Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
>> Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:27:17 +0200
>>> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
> Boris Brezillon wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:27:17 +0200
>> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> > On
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
> Boris Brezillon wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:27:17 +0200
>> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Boris Brezillon
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:27:17 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Boris Brezillon
> > wrote:
> >
>
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:27:17 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Boris Brezillon
> > wrote:
> >
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c | 2269
> > > +++
> > >
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:27:17 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
>
> > drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c | 2269 +++
> >
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:27:17 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
>
> > drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c | 2269 +++
> > drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c| 2479
> > --
>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c | 2269 +++
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c| 2479
> --
Does -M -C help you?
At least it would
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c | 2269 +++
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c| 2479
> --
Does -M -C help you?
At least it would help reviewers
--
With Best
72 matches
Mail list logo