On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> This will allow IRQ stacks to nest inside NMIs or similar entries
>> that can happen during IRQ stack setup or teardown.
>>
>> The Xen code here has a confusing comment.
>>
>> The
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This will allow IRQ stacks to nest inside NMIs or similar entries
> that can happen during IRQ stack setup or teardown.
>
> The Xen code here has a confusing comment.
>
> The new macros won't work correctly if they're invoked with IRQs on.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:57:04PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This will allow IRQ stacks to nest inside NMIs or similar entries
> that can happen during IRQ stack setup or teardown.
>
> The Xen code here has a confusing comment.
>
> The new macros won't work correctly if they're invoked with
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:57:04PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> This will allow IRQ stacks to nest inside NMIs or similar entries
>> that can happen during IRQ stack setup or teardown.
>>
>> The Xen code here has a confusing comment.
>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:57:04PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This will allow IRQ stacks to nest inside NMIs or similar entries
> that can happen during IRQ stack setup or teardown.
>
> The Xen code here has a confusing comment.
>
> The new macros won't work correctly if they're invoked with
This will allow IRQ stacks to nest inside NMIs or similar entries
that can happen during IRQ stack setup or teardown.
The Xen code here has a confusing comment.
The new macros won't work correctly if they're invoked with IRQs on.
Add a check under CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY to detect that.
Signed-off-by
6 matches
Mail list logo