On 02/27/2014 09:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Just like for other ISA extension instruction uses we should check
whether the assembler actually supports them. The fallback here simply
is to encode an instruction with fixed operands (%eax and %ecx).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Cc: Francesco Fusco
Just like for other ISA extension instruction uses we should check
whether the assembler actually supports them. The fallback here simply
is to encode an instruction with fixed operands (%eax and %ecx).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Cc: Francesco Fusco
Cc: Daniel Borkmann
Cc: Thomas Graf
Cc:
Just like for other ISA extension instruction uses we should check
whether the assembler actually supports them. The fallback here simply
is to encode an instruction with fixed operands (%eax and %ecx).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com
Cc: Francesco Fusco ffu...@redhat.com
Cc: Daniel
On 02/27/2014 09:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Just like for other ISA extension instruction uses we should check
whether the assembler actually supports them. The fallback here simply
is to encode an instruction with fixed operands (%eax and %ecx).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich jbeul...@suse.com
Cc:
4 matches
Mail list logo