Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist

2018-02-12 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 23:39 +, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c > > @@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ static const struct sku_microcode > > spectre_bad_microcodes[] = { > > {

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist

2018-02-12 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 23:39 +, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c > > @@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ static const struct sku_microcode > > spectre_bad_microcodes[] = { > > {

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist

2018-02-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 23:39 +, David Woodhouse wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c > @@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ static const struct sku_microcode > spectre_bad_microcodes[] = { > { INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,   0x09,   0x84 }, > {

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist

2018-02-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 23:39 +, David Woodhouse wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c > @@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ static const struct sku_microcode > spectre_bad_microcodes[] = { > { INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,   0x09,   0x84 }, > {

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist

2018-02-12 Thread Darren Kenny
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:39:22PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: Intel have retroactively blessed the 0xc2 microcode on Skylake mobile and desktop parts, and the Gemini Lake 0x22 microcode is apparently fine too. We blacklisted the latter purely because it was present with all the other

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist

2018-02-12 Thread Darren Kenny
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:39:22PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: Intel have retroactively blessed the 0xc2 microcode on Skylake mobile and desktop parts, and the Gemini Lake 0x22 microcode is apparently fine too. We blacklisted the latter purely because it was present with all the other

[PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist

2018-02-10 Thread David Woodhouse
Intel have retroactively blessed the 0xc2 microcode on Skylake mobile and desktop parts, and the Gemini Lake 0x22 microcode is apparently fine too. We blacklisted the latter purely because it was present with all the other problematic ones in the 2018-01-08 release, but now it's explicitly listed

[PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist

2018-02-10 Thread David Woodhouse
Intel have retroactively blessed the 0xc2 microcode on Skylake mobile and desktop parts, and the Gemini Lake 0x22 microcode is apparently fine too. We blacklisted the latter purely because it was present with all the other problematic ones in the 2018-01-08 release, but now it's explicitly listed