On 09/10/2020 14.59, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10:43-20201009, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Nishanth,
>>
>> On 09/10/2020 6.02, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 14:52-20201008, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
- ring->ring_mem_virt = dma_alloc_coherent(ringacc->dev,
+ ring->ring_mem_virt =
On 10:43-20201009, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Nishanth,
>
> On 09/10/2020 6.02, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 14:52-20201008, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> - ring->ring_mem_virt = dma_alloc_coherent(ringacc->dev,
> >> + ring->ring_mem_virt = dma_alloc_coherent(ring->dma_dev,
> >>
Nishanth,
On 09/10/2020 6.02, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 14:52-20201008, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> -ring->ring_mem_virt = dma_alloc_coherent(ringacc->dev,
>> +ring->ring_mem_virt = dma_alloc_coherent(ring->dma_dev,
>> ring->size * (4 << ring->elm_size),
On 14:52-20201008, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> - ring->ring_mem_virt = dma_alloc_coherent(ringacc->dev,
> + ring->ring_mem_virt = dma_alloc_coherent(ring->dma_dev,
> ring->size * (4 << ring->elm_size),
> >ring_mem_dma,
In RING mode the ringacc does not access the ring memory. In this access
mode the ringacc coherency does not have meaning.
If the ring is configured in RING mode, then the ringacc itself will not
access to the ring memory. Only the requester (user) of the ring is going
to read/write to the
5 matches
Mail list logo