Re: [PATCH v2 10/19] PM / devfreq: tegra: Drop primary interrupt handler

Hi, On 19. 4. 17. 오전 12:23, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 16.04.2019 8:56, Chanwoo Choi пишет: >> Hi, >> >> It looks good to me to drop the primary interrupt handler >> but I have some comments. Please check it. >> >> On 19. 4. 15. 오후 11:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>> There is no real need in the

Re: [PATCH v2 10/19] PM / devfreq: tegra: Drop primary interrupt handler

16.04.2019 8:56, Chanwoo Choi пишет: > Hi, > > It looks good to me to drop the primary interrupt handler > but I have some comments. Please check it. > > On 19. 4. 15. 오후 11:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> There is no real need in the primary interrupt handler, hence move >> everything to the

Re: [PATCH v2 10/19] PM / devfreq: tegra: Drop primary interrupt handler

Hi, It looks good to me to drop the primary interrupt handler but I have some comments. Please check it. On 19. 4. 15. 오후 11:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > There is no real need in the primary interrupt handler, hence move > everything to the secondary (threaded) handler. In a result locking > is

[PATCH v2 10/19] PM / devfreq: tegra: Drop primary interrupt handler

There is no real need in the primary interrupt handler, hence move everything to the secondary (threaded) handler. In a result locking is consistent now and there are no potential races with the interrupt handler because it is protected with the devfreq's mutex. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko