On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:06:43AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 17:39 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 04:04:21PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > I think we trigger PF_POISONED_CHECK() in
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 17:39 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 04:04:21PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > I think we trigger PF_POISONED_CHECK() in PageSlab(), then
> > > fffe
> > > is "accessed" from
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 04:04:21PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > I think we trigger PF_POISONED_CHECK() in PageSlab(), then fffe
> > is "accessed" from VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().
> >
> > It seems to me that we are not initializing struct
On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> I think we trigger PF_POISONED_CHECK() in PageSlab(), then fffe
> is "accessed" from VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().
>
> It seems to me that we are not initializing struct pages for holes at the node
> boundaries because zones are already
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 01:45:37PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 10:24 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:03:00PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 23:43 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > From: Mike Rapoport
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 10:24 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:03:00PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 23:43 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > From: Mike Rapoport
> > >
> > > Interleave initialization of pages that correspond to holes with the
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:03:00PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 23:43 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport
> >
> > Interleave initialization of pages that correspond to holes with the
> > initialization of memory map, so that zone and node information will
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 23:43 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport
>
> There could be struct pages that are not backed by actual physical memory.
> This can happen when the actual memory bank is not a multiple of
> SECTION_SIZE or when an architecture does not register memory holes
>
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport
>
> There could be struct pages that are not backed by actual physical memory.
> This can happen when the actual memory bank is not a multiple of
> SECTION_SIZE or when an architecture does not register memory
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> +void __init __weak memmap_init(unsigned long size, int nid,
> +unsigned long zone,
> +unsigned long range_start_pfn)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn,
From: Mike Rapoport
There could be struct pages that are not backed by actual physical memory.
This can happen when the actual memory bank is not a multiple of
SECTION_SIZE or when an architecture does not register memory holes
reserved by the firmware as memblock.memory.
Such pages are
11 matches
Mail list logo
