On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 07:04:27PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 07:04:27PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 07:04:27PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> > On
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 07:04:27PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> > On Wed,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> The DAX
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> The DAX
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
> >> vma_is_dax()
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
> >> vma_is_dax() helper to
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Darrick J. Wong
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> The
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Darrick J. Wong
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
> >> vma_is_dax()
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
> >> vma_is_dax() helper to
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
>> vma_is_dax() helper to check the S_DAX inode flag. However, this is
>> only
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
>> vma_is_dax() helper to check the S_DAX inode flag. However, this is
>> only available internal
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
> vma_is_dax() helper to check the S_DAX inode flag. However, this is
> only available internal to the kernel and is a property that userspace
> applications
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:54:38PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
> vma_is_dax() helper to check the S_DAX inode flag. However, this is
> only available internal to the kernel and is a property that userspace
> applications
The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
vma_is_dax() helper to check the S_DAX inode flag. However, this is
only available internal to the kernel and is a property that userspace
applications would like to interrogate.
Yes, this new VM_DAX flag is only available
The DAX property, page cache bypass, of a VMA is only detectable via the
vma_is_dax() helper to check the S_DAX inode flag. However, this is
only available internal to the kernel and is a property that userspace
applications would like to interrogate.
Yes, this new VM_DAX flag is only available
26 matches
Mail list logo