On 15.01.2019 00:53, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:08:19PM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 11.01.2019 14:39, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> Like I say I'm working offline so I can't check the links but it sounds
>>> like you're saying that the existing suspend mode co
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:08:19PM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 11.01.2019 14:39, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Like I say I'm working offline so I can't check the links but it sounds
> > like you're saying that the existing suspend mode configuration features
> > are enough for your sy
On 11.01.2019 14:39, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:24:26AM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 09.01.2019 18:57, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> regulator state which feels fragile. But based on the cover letter
>>> that's kind of like what the initial proposal about targ
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:24:26AM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 09.01.2019 18:57, Mark Brown wrote:
> > regulator state which feels fragile. But based on the cover letter
> > that's kind of like what the initial proposal about target states was so
> > perhaps this is the way we
On 09.01.2019 18:57, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:56:32AM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea
>>
>> Add helper to check if regulator will be disabled in suspend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
>
> This feels like it's the wrong way round -
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:56:32AM +, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea
>
> Add helper to check if regulator will be disabled in suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
This feels like it's the wrong way round - if this is configurable I'd
expect something to co
From: Claudiu Beznea
Add helper to check if regulator will be disabled in suspend.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 17 +
include/linux/regulator/consumer.h | 7 +++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/cor
7 matches
Mail list logo
