On 05/13/2017 at 04:58 AM, luca abeni wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:19:55 +0800
> Xunlei Pang wrote:
> [...]
"As seen, enforcing that the total utilization is smaller than M
does not guarantee that global EDF schedules the tasks without
missing any deadline (in
On 05/13/2017 at 04:58 AM, luca abeni wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:19:55 +0800
> Xunlei Pang wrote:
> [...]
"As seen, enforcing that the total utilization is smaller than M
does not guarantee that global EDF schedules the tasks without
missing any deadline (in other words,
On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:19:55 +0800
Xunlei Pang wrote:
[...]
> >> "As seen, enforcing that the total utilization is smaller than M
> >> does not guarantee that global EDF schedules the tasks without
> >> missing any deadline (in other words, global EDF is not an optimal
> >>
On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:19:55 +0800
Xunlei Pang wrote:
[...]
> >> "As seen, enforcing that the total utilization is smaller than M
> >> does not guarantee that global EDF schedules the tasks without
> >> missing any deadline (in other words, global EDF is not an optimal
> >> scheduling
On 05/12/2017 at 03:01 PM, luca abeni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 14:53:33 +0800
> Xunlei Pang wrote:
>
>> On 05/12/2017 at 01:57 PM, luca abeni wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> (sorry for the previous email; I replied from gmail and I did not
>>> realize I was sending it
On 05/12/2017 at 03:01 PM, luca abeni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 14:53:33 +0800
> Xunlei Pang wrote:
>
>> On 05/12/2017 at 01:57 PM, luca abeni wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> (sorry for the previous email; I replied from gmail and I did not
>>> realize I was sending it in html).
>>>
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, 12 May 2017 14:53:33 +0800
Xunlei Pang wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 at 01:57 PM, luca abeni wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > (sorry for the previous email; I replied from gmail and I did not
> > realize I was sending it in html).
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 12 May 2017 11:32:08
Hi,
On Fri, 12 May 2017 14:53:33 +0800
Xunlei Pang wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 at 01:57 PM, luca abeni wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > (sorry for the previous email; I replied from gmail and I did not
> > realize I was sending it in html).
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 12 May 2017 11:32:08 +0800
> > Xunlei Pang
On 05/12/2017 at 01:57 PM, luca abeni wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> (sorry for the previous email; I replied from gmail and I did not
> realize I was sending it in html).
>
>
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 11:32:08 +0800
> Xunlei Pang wrote:
>
>> dl_runtime_exceeded() only checks negative
On 05/12/2017 at 01:57 PM, luca abeni wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> (sorry for the previous email; I replied from gmail and I did not
> realize I was sending it in html).
>
>
> On Fri, 12 May 2017 11:32:08 +0800
> Xunlei Pang wrote:
>
>> dl_runtime_exceeded() only checks negative runtime, actually
>>
Hi again,
(sorry for the previous email; I replied from gmail and I did not
realize I was sending it in html).
On Fri, 12 May 2017 11:32:08 +0800
Xunlei Pang wrote:
> dl_runtime_exceeded() only checks negative runtime, actually
> when the current deadline past, we should
Hi again,
(sorry for the previous email; I replied from gmail and I did not
realize I was sending it in html).
On Fri, 12 May 2017 11:32:08 +0800
Xunlei Pang wrote:
> dl_runtime_exceeded() only checks negative runtime, actually
> when the current deadline past, we should start a new period
>
dl_runtime_exceeded() only checks negative runtime, actually
when the current deadline past, we should start a new period
and zero out the remaining runtime as well.
This patch improves dl_runtime_exceeded() to achieve that.
Fixes: 269ad8015a6b ("sched/deadline: Avoid double-accounting in case
dl_runtime_exceeded() only checks negative runtime, actually
when the current deadline past, we should start a new period
and zero out the remaining runtime as well.
This patch improves dl_runtime_exceeded() to achieve that.
Fixes: 269ad8015a6b ("sched/deadline: Avoid double-accounting in case
14 matches
Mail list logo