On Thursday, October 27, 2016 11:34:33 AM CEST Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > @@ -257,17 +264,20 @@ static void __pass_event(struct evdev_client *client,
> >
> > static void evdev_pass_values(struct evdev_client *client,
> > const struct input_value *vals, unsigned int count,
>
On Thursday, October 27, 2016 11:34:33 AM CEST Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > @@ -257,17 +264,20 @@ static void __pass_event(struct evdev_client *client,
> >
> > static void evdev_pass_values(struct evdev_client *client,
> > const struct input_value *vals, unsigned int count,
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:27:31PM -0700, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> struct timeval is not y2038 safe.
>
> All references to timeval in the kernel will be replaced
> by y2038 safe structures.
> Replace all references to timeval with y2038 safe
> struct timespec64 here.
>
> struct input_event will
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:27:31PM -0700, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> struct timeval is not y2038 safe.
>
> All references to timeval in the kernel will be replaced
> by y2038 safe structures.
> Replace all references to timeval with y2038 safe
> struct timespec64 here.
>
> struct input_event will
struct timeval is not y2038 safe.
All references to timeval in the kernel will be replaced
by y2038 safe structures.
Replace all references to timeval with y2038 safe
struct timespec64 here.
struct input_event will be changed in a different patch.
Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani
struct timeval is not y2038 safe.
All references to timeval in the kernel will be replaced
by y2038 safe structures.
Replace all references to timeval with y2038 safe
struct timespec64 here.
struct input_event will be changed in a different patch.
Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani
Reviewed-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo