Hi, Baibir
sorry for late responce, I missed reading your mail.
在 16/7/6 18:54, Balbir Singh 写道:
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 10:43 -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself.
Hi, Baibir
sorry for late responce, I missed reading your mail.
在 16/7/6 18:54, Balbir Singh 写道:
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 10:43 -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself.
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 10:43 -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 10:43 -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
On 2016年07月06日 16:32, Wanpeng Li wrote:
2016-07-06 15:58 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is
set by powerVM/KVM.
and only pSeries can run a guest
On 2016年07月06日 16:32, Wanpeng Li wrote:
2016-07-06 15:58 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is
set by powerVM/KVM.
and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :)
I also
2016-07-06 15:58 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra :
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> > SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is
>> > set by powerVM/KVM.
>> > and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :)
>> >
>> > I
2016-07-06 15:58 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra :
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> > SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is
>> > set by powerVM/KVM.
>> > and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :)
>> >
>> > I also review x86 related
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is
> > set by powerVM/KVM.
> > and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :)
> >
> > I also review x86 related code, looks like we need add one hyer-call to get
>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is
> > set by powerVM/KVM.
> > and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :)
> >
> > I also review x86 related code, looks like we need add one hyer-call to get
>
Cc Paolo, kvm ml
2016-07-06 12:58 GMT+08:00 xinhui :
> Hi, wanpeng
>
> On 2016年07月05日 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi Xinhui,
>> 2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui :
>>>
>>> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some
Cc Paolo, kvm ml
2016-07-06 12:58 GMT+08:00 xinhui :
> Hi, wanpeng
>
> On 2016年07月05日 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi Xinhui,
>> 2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui :
>>>
>>> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
>>> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring
Hi, wanpeng
On 2016年07月05日 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote:
Hi Xinhui,
2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui :
This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
kernel has an
Hi, wanpeng
On 2016年07月05日 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote:
Hi Xinhui,
2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui :
This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
kernel has an interface of bool
Hi Xinhui,
2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui :
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take
Hi Xinhui,
2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui :
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
> as parameter and
This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break
the
This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently
kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the cpu
as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can break
the
18 matches
Mail list logo