On 04/08/2014 07:27 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 09:03:27AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>>> If in doubt follow common mainline practice. Although using includes
>>> for DT is not necessarily common practice, readability of DTs is
>>> really important IMHO.
>>
>> Let me
On 04/08/2014 07:27 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 09:03:27AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
If in doubt follow common mainline practice. Although using includes
for DT is not necessarily common practice, readability of DTs is
really important IMHO.
Let me give you one
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 09:03:27AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> > If in doubt follow common mainline practice. Although using includes
> > for DT is not necessarily common practice, readability of DTs is
> > really important IMHO.
>
> Let me give you one example. When you add xilinx intc
On 04/07/2014 08:02 PM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:10:12AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:24:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>> Device-tree BSP and in 2014.01 there will be new BSP which just
>>> generate them directly from the
On 04/07/2014 08:02 PM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:10:12AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:24:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Device-tree BSP and in 2014.01 there will be new BSP which just
generate them directly from the Vivado tools
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 09:03:27AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
If in doubt follow common mainline practice. Although using includes
for DT is not necessarily common practice, readability of DTs is
really important IMHO.
Let me give you one example. When you add xilinx intc controller
to
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:10:12AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:24:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> > Device-tree BSP and in 2014.01 there will be new BSP which just
> > generate them directly from the Vivado tools which just target your
> > reference design.
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:24:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Device-tree BSP and in 2014.01 there will be new BSP which just
> generate them directly from the Vivado tools which just target your
> reference design. You can connect your custom IP (or Xilinx or 3rd
> party) directly to the GIC
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 02:17PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 07:58 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> >Hi Soren,
> >
> >On 04/05/2014 01:14 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> >>Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
> >>This allows to include header files in the
Hi Mike,
On 04/07/2014 02:17 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 07:58 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Soren,
>>
>> On 04/05/2014 01:14 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>>> Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
>>> This allows to include header files in the devicetrees
On 04/07/2014 07:58 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Soren,
On 04/05/2014 01:14 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
This allows to include header files in the devicetrees like other
SoC-types already do.
Inspired-by: Steffen Trumtrar
On 04/07/2014 07:58 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Soren,
On 04/05/2014 01:14 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
This allows to include header files in the devicetrees like other
SoC-types already do.
Inspired-by: Steffen Trumtrar
Hi Mike,
On 04/07/2014 02:17 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
On 04/07/2014 07:58 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Soren,
On 04/05/2014 01:14 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
This allows to include header files in the devicetrees like other
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 02:17PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
On 04/07/2014 07:58 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Soren,
On 04/05/2014 01:14 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
This allows to include header files in the devicetrees like other
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:24:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Device-tree BSP and in 2014.01 there will be new BSP which just
generate them directly from the Vivado tools which just target your
reference design. You can connect your custom IP (or Xilinx or 3rd
party) directly to the GIC
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:10:12AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:24:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Device-tree BSP and in 2014.01 there will be new BSP which just
generate them directly from the Vivado tools which just target your
reference design. You
Hi Soren,
On 04/05/2014 01:14 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
> This allows to include header files in the devicetrees like other
> SoC-types already do.
>
> Inspired-by: Steffen Trumtrar
>
Hi Soren,
On 04/05/2014 01:14 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
This allows to include header files in the devicetrees like other
SoC-types already do.
Inspired-by: Steffen Trumtrar s.trumt...@pengutronix.de
Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
This allows to include header files in the devicetrees like other
SoC-types already do.
Inspired-by: Steffen Trumtrar
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319832.html)
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann
---
Changes in v2:
Convert all Zynq DT files to the dtc preprocessor include syntax.
This allows to include header files in the devicetrees like other
SoC-types already do.
Inspired-by: Steffen Trumtrar s.trumt...@pengutronix.de
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319832.html)
Signed-off-by: Soren
20 matches
Mail list logo
