On 04/10/2019 08:27 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:33 AM Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
On 04/10/2019 08:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 01:51:25AM -0400, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
- fix the case where stack randomization should not be taken into
account.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:33 AM Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2019 08:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 01:51:25AM -0400, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> >> - fix the case where stack randomization should not be taken into
> >>account.
> > Hmm. This sounds a bit
On 04/10/2019 08:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 01:51:25AM -0400, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
- fix the case where stack randomization should not be taken into
account.
Hmm. This sounds a bit vague. It might be better if something
considered a fix is split out to a
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 01:51:25AM -0400, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> - fix the case where stack randomization should not be taken into
> account.
Hmm. This sounds a bit vague. It might be better if something
considered a fix is split out to a separate patch with a good
description.
> +config
arm64 handles top-down mmap layout in a way that can be easily reused
by other architectures, so make it available in mm.
This commit also takes the opportunity to:
- make use of is_compat_task instead of specific arm64 test
test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT), which allows more genericity and is
5 matches
Mail list logo