On 04/01/2021 16:37, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 03:17:34PM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
>> @@ -865,3 +865,10 @@ no matter what. Everything is handled by the caller.
>>
>>
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 03:17:34PM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
> @@ -865,3 +865,10 @@ no matter what. Everything is handled by the caller.
>
> clone_private_mount() returns a longterm mount now, so the
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 03:17:34PM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> zero-length bvec segments are allowed in general, but not handled by bio
> and down the block layer so filtered out. This inconsistency may be
> confusing and prevent from optimisations. As zero-length segments are
> useless and
zero-length bvec segments are allowed in general, but not handled by bio
and down the block layer so filtered out. This inconsistency may be
confusing and prevent from optimisations. As zero-length segments are
useless and places that were generating them are patched, declare them
not allowed.
4 matches
Mail list logo