On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:27:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:24:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote:
>
> > > > --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > > > @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ struct memelfnote
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > static LIST_HEAD(kclist_head);
> > > >
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:27:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:24:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote:
>
> > > > --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > > > @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ struct memelfnote
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > static LIST_HEAD(kclist_head);
> > > >
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:24:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > > @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ struct memelfnote
> > > };
> > >
> > > static LIST_HEAD(kclist_head);
> > > -static DEFINE_RWLOCK(kclist_lock);
> > > -static int kcore_need_update = 1;
> >
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 20:24:05 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > > @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ struct memelfnote
> > > };
> > >
> > > static LIST_HEAD(kclist_head);
> > > -static DEFINE_RWLOCK(kclist_lock);
> > > -static int kcore_need_update = 1;
> >
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 07:38:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:09:34 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote:
>
> > From: Omar Sandoval
> >
> > Now we only need kclist_lock from user context and at fs init time, and
> > the following changes need to sleep while holding the
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 07:38:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:09:34 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote:
>
> > From: Omar Sandoval
> >
> > Now we only need kclist_lock from user context and at fs init time, and
> > the following changes need to sleep while holding the
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:09:34 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval
>
> Now we only need kclist_lock from user context and at fs init time, and
> the following changes need to sleep while holding the kclist_lock.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> @@ -59,8
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:09:34 -0700 Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval
>
> Now we only need kclist_lock from user context and at fs init time, and
> the following changes need to sleep while holding the kclist_lock.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> @@ -59,8
From: Omar Sandoval
Now we only need kclist_lock from user context and at fs init time, and
the following changes need to sleep while holding the kclist_lock.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval
---
fs/proc/kcore.c | 32 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17
From: Omar Sandoval
Now we only need kclist_lock from user context and at fs init time, and
the following changes need to sleep while holding the kclist_lock.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval
---
fs/proc/kcore.c | 32 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17
10 matches
Mail list logo