Hi Torsten,
On 17/08/18 11:27, Torsten Duwe wrote:
This is more an RFC in the original sense: is this basically
the correct approach? (as I had to tweak the save_stack API a bit).
In particular the code does not detect interrupts and exception
frames, and does not yet check whether the code
Hi Torsten,
On 17/08/18 11:27, Torsten Duwe wrote:
This is more an RFC in the original sense: is this basically
the correct approach? (as I had to tweak the save_stack API a bit).
In particular the code does not detect interrupts and exception
frames, and does not yet check whether the code
This is more an RFC in the original sense: is this basically
the correct approach? (as I had to tweak the save_stack API a bit).
In particular the code does not detect interrupts and exception
frames, and does not yet check whether the code address is valid.
The latter check would also have to be
This is more an RFC in the original sense: is this basically
the correct approach? (as I had to tweak the save_stack API a bit).
In particular the code does not detect interrupts and exception
frames, and does not yet check whether the code address is valid.
The latter check would also have to be
4 matches
Mail list logo
