On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Amir,
>
> Am 09.05.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Amir Goldstein:
>>> Then we can queue this patch for 4.13.
>>> Please resend and make sure it addresses everything what was also
>>> suggested for the xfs s_uuid patch.
>>>
>>
>> Just to be clear,
On 05/09/2017 09:08 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Oleksij,
Am 09.05.2017 um 07:52 schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
If VFS maintainers are fine with that, I'll take it.
From UBIFS' POV it does not matter much. :-)
Ping to
Amir,
Am 09.05.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Amir Goldstein:
>> Then we can queue this patch for 4.13.
>> Please resend and make sure it addresses everything what was also
>> suggested for the xfs s_uuid patch.
>>
>
> Just to be clear, the xfs s_uuid patch is just a memcpy,
> no different from Oleksij's
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> Oleksij,
>
> Am 09.05.2017 um 07:52 schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
> >>
> >> If VFS maintainers are fine with that, I'll take it.
> >> From UBIFS' POV it does not matter much. :-)
> >>
> >>
> >> Ping to VFS maintainers?
>
Oleksij,
Am 09.05.2017 um 07:52 schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
>>
>> If VFS maintainers are fine with that, I'll take it.
>> From UBIFS' POV it does not matter much. :-)
>>
>>
>> Ping to VFS maintainers?
>>
>>
>> What ping? Al made it clear that a flag is not needed.
>> BTW, xfs s_uui
On 05/09/2017 07:37 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Oleksij Rempel mailto:o...@pengutronix.de>> wrote:
On 05/02/2017 09:37 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Amir,
Am 02.05.2017 um 09:19 schrieb Amir Goldstein:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at
On 05/02/2017 09:37 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Amir,
Am 02.05.2017 um 09:19 schrieb Amir Goldstein:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :)
I'll not do it
Amir,
Am 02.05.2017 um 09:19 schrieb Amir Goldstein:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :)
>>>
>>> I'll not do it for you. ;)
>>
>> Please also see http:/
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 22:43 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Makes sense.
>
> Artem, do you remember why UBIFS didn't set s_uuid in first place?
Just did not notice it I think.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>>> So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :)
>>
>> I'll not do it for you. ;)
>
> Please also see http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149327990608749&w=2
>
Richard,
On 04/28/2017 10:53 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :)
I'll not do it for you. ;)
Please also see http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsde
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>>> So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :)
>>
>> I'll not do it for you. ;)
>
> Please also see http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149327990608749&w=2
>
Perhaps y
Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>> So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :)
>
> I'll not do it for you. ;)
Please also see http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149327990608749&w=2
Thanks,
//richard
Oleksij,
Am 12.04.2017 um 09:15 schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:48:28PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:43:26PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Artem, do you remember why UBIFS didn't set s_uuid in first place?
>>
>> It's an extremely odd fie
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:48:28PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:43:26PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Artem, do you remember why UBIFS didn't set s_uuid in first place?
>
> It's an extremely odd field - only a hand full of file systems set it
> (e.g. XFS does
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:43:26PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Artem, do you remember why UBIFS didn't set s_uuid in first place?
It's an extremely odd field - only a hand full of file systems set it
(e.g. XFS doesn't, although according to Mimi IMA supports XFS), and
it's never even used o
Oleksij,
Am 11.04.2017 um 11:50 schrieb Oleksij Rempel:
> From: Steffen Trumtrar
>
> This is need to provide uuid based integrity functionlity for:
> imy_policy (fsuuid option) and evmctl (--uuid option).
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel
> ---
> fs/ubifs/s
From: Steffen Trumtrar
This is need to provide uuid based integrity functionlity for:
imy_policy (fsuuid option) and evmctl (--uuid option).
Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel
---
fs/ubifs/super.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c
18 matches
Mail list logo