On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:12:08PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Non-DT irq handlers were working through irq causes from most-significant
> to least-significant bit, while DT irqchip driver does it the other way
> round. This revealed some more HW issues on Kirkwood peripheral IP, where
>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:12:08PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Non-DT irq handlers were working through irq causes from most-significant
to least-significant bit, while DT irqchip driver does it the other way
round. This revealed some more HW issues on Kirkwood peripheral IP, where
Non-DT irq handlers were working through irq causes from most-significant
to least-significant bit, while DT irqchip driver does it the other way
round. This revealed some more HW issues on Kirkwood peripheral IP, where
spurious sdio irqs can happen although irqs are masked.
Also, the generated
Non-DT irq handlers were working through irq causes from most-significant
to least-significant bit, while DT irqchip driver does it the other way
round. This revealed some more HW issues on Kirkwood peripheral IP, where
spurious sdio irqs can happen although irqs are masked.
Also, the generated
4 matches
Mail list logo